🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to talk to white audiences about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The surge has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has developed since that time, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the month is commemorated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how important it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the current time in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a elected representative gains confidence to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in parts of a city is a source of worry. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the EU as a complete entity.

In the America, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A campaign to erase the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's early administrative commands focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the observance symbolises how insufficiently it can be influential if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the conditions of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a prof at an educational institution, put it best when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just do away with events including Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and heritage of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an foundation that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it ignores the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and awareness of minor insults, but faced with the risks that affect everyone if anti-racism is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and responsive. Perhaps an complete renaming is necessary – Black History is Now Month.